There
is nothing worse than seeing your own country denigrated in the
foreign press. Sadly, this is what the blinkered supporters of Jacob
Zuma, the former Deputy President of South Africa fired for alleged
corruption and on trial for rape, are doing. Stories of his supporters
protesting outside the court have been splashed all over the foreign
media. It has been shocking to see supporters burning pictures of
the woman who accuses Zuma and carrying placards reading Zuma
is being raped. Liesl Gerntholtz, executive director of Tshwaranang
Legal Advocacy Centre, claims she even heard teenage girls outside
the court saying: We are waiting for Zuma to rape us too
we want to be Zumas women. Given that some 50 000 rapes
are reported each year in South Africa, this must leave outsiders,
and I hope the majority in the country too, wondering just what
is going on.
Of
course, people have a right to support whoever they want, especially
someone they see as having a significant role in liberating their
country. I do not take issue with this. However, what is startling
is how unequivocal and ferocious this support is. It seems like
his supporters, to twist George Bushs famous mantra, are saying:
You are either for him or against him. If you do not
support him, you are a political enemy and will be subjected to
abuse. The fact that their aggressive protests will deter future
rape survivors from bringing charges before the court in a country
where one in nine cases of rape are reported seems of little consequence
to them. The protestors actions highlight that there is still
something deeply wrong within parts of South African society. The
old apartheid mindset, which taught that the world was literally
a black-and-white place, either all good or all bad, is alive and
well. Further, if Zumas supporters have such unwavering conviction
of his innocence, something neither they nor I have a clue about,
then why not let the law run its course? The response, I imagine,
most would give is that the charges are a political conspiracy to
oust him as the next president. Do they seriously believe the entire
legal system will conspire to deliver the exact verdict his enemies
want? Sounds like paranoia to me, which is the flip side of the
You are either with us or against us mentality. Of course,
Zumas supporters are not alone in this didactic thinking.
Remember how Hansie Cronje was one day a hero and the next the pariah
against all Afrikaners for fixing cricket matches. The inability
of African leaders to condemn Robert Mugabes recent actions
because of his past accomplishments as a liberation leader is another
case in point, not to mention the way many whites use someone like
Mugabe to make blanket assumptions about the draconian tendencies
of all black politicians.
The
ability to treat a situation with any subtlety seems to have died
somewhere in our violent past. Is it not possible that someone can
support a person politically or value his or her past actions, but,
equally, be concerned about his or her current behaviour? It is
time to shake off the past and grow up as a democracy. It might
have been functional during apartheid times to see all those on
your side as heroes and beyond reproach or all your enemies as evil,
but the real world is just not like that. Surely, one can respect
what Zuma has done as a politician but, at the same time, deplore
the way he has let his supporters run wild in recent weeks, especially
considering he is a former chairperson of the Moral Regeneration
Campaign. Likewise, if he is found guilty, it will not erase his
earlier contribution to helping the new South Africa on its way
but, equally, his past achievements should not deter the law from
taking its course.
Brandon
Hamber writes the column "Look South": an analysis
of trends in global political, social and cultural life and its
relevance to South Africa on Polity, see http://www.polity.co.za/pol/opinion/brandon/.
To get "Look South" by email each week click
here.
"Look South" published by

|