This
year, perhaps because I like punishment, I spent considerable time
poring over the 7 800 words of South African President Thabo Mbekis
State of the Nation address. It was not reading it, however, that
was punishing, rather its central message. The text itself is a
good read, filled with quotes from Shakespeare, the poet Ingrid
Jonker, and a liberal smattering of the prophet Isaiah. Mbeki is
eloquent and his speeches are often interesting. But what I missed
this time round was the challenge and the controversy. The core
message was just a little too mainstream for my anarchic brain.
Remember Mbekis comment in 1998 that South Africa consists
of two nations, one white and rich, the other black and poor. Now
that got the nation talking. His challenges about ongoing racism
at the national conference on racism, in 2000, and at other times
too, have had similar effects. Mbekis message these days,
if his State of the Nation speech is anything to go by, is a lot
blander. He seems to think, while acknowledging challenges like
corruption and poverty, that South Africa is a nation of patriots
shaking off the past and happily working together in partnership
on board the slow gravy train to transformation. Using Mbekis
own words, yesterday was another country and South Africa
is entering an age of hope. He feels the years
of freedom have been very good for business and business need
not fear for its financial wellbeing, as long as it is helping grow
the economy. In fact, the word growth is used a whopping
19 times in his State of the Nation speech. Mbeki also spends much
time in his speech thanking the world, its brother and its former
roommates for their contribution to the new South Africa, from Bollywood
actor Anil Kapoor to the millions who have tried to make a go of
things since 1994. The only ones to get a lambasting are Bafana
Bafana, who are singled out because they did nothing to advertise
our strengths as a winning nation in the African Cup of Nations.
Again, hardly a controversial statement, since 99% of South Africans
probably agree.
Where
has Mbeki the controversial gone? Although some parties criticised
Mbeki for skirting issues concerning Aids, crime and corruption,
they all, from the SACP to Tony Leon, liked the focus on the economy.
This
I find worrying rather than encouraging. Have Mbekis years
of being beaten by the local and international press, if he vaguely
challenges the wealthy, muzzled him, or is South Africa becoming
a boring middle-of-the-road sort of place, where fiscal man-agement
and interest rates are hot topics of discussion? If I can put this
another way: if we substituted the words Bafana Bafana
for the England football team (who also have a knack for falling
from footballing grace given half a chance), there is something
decidedly Tony Blair about Mbekis speech.
The
standard New Labour mantra works in a similar fashion: sycophantic
praise for various people, excessive mention of publicprivate
partnership and a barrage of statistics to drive home how good the
ruling party has been for the country, the economy and, largely,
the middle class.
That
said, I do not doubt the achievements of the ANC government, given
the social problems facing South Africa, and it is great that South
Africa has a literate president, unlike some superpowers. But I
think a good president challenges the population. Mbeki has excelled
at this over the years. I know some of you reading this probably
dislike him intensely for that but, as they say, you have to break
eggs to make an omelette. If the president is not going to cause
a hullabaloo from time to time, and particularly challenge the wealthy
and the complacent, then who will?
Brandon
Hamber writes the column "Look South": an analysis
of trends in global political, social and cultural life and its
relevance to South Africa on Polity, see http://www.polity.co.za/pol/opinion/brandon/.
To get "Look South" by email each week click
here.
"Look South" published by

|