Australian
golfer Greg Norman is quoted as saying, Its not the
victories that count to me. Its the quality of how you deliver
your losses and the quality of how you deliver your victories.
For Tony Blair, whose Labour Party won the May 2005 election in
the UK, the quality of the victory was dismal. Granted, Blair won
a historic third term and is the only UK prime minister since the
war, with Margaret Thatcher, to have triumphed in three successive
general elections. But his majority of 161 seats was cut dramatically
to 67; less than half of what it was in the landslide victories
of 1997 and 2001. More alarming for Blair is that his party now
has the lowest share of the vote for a UK ruling party in modern
times. Due to the first past the post electoral system,
Labour holds 55% of the seats in parliament. However, it has only
35% of the share of the vote, with the Conservatives holding 32%
and the Liberal Democrats 22%. So, although Blair won the election,
the electorate has rapped his knuckles. Blair acknowledges that
Iraq was deeply divisive, and commentators put it and
the lack of trust in Blair generally at the core of the slump in
the Labour vote. A recent Populus poll found that close to half
of the public who claim to have once trusted Blair feel this has
now been lost. It is no wonder that taunting names such as B-Liar
and Phoney Tony have stuck in the public consciousness.
But
will Blair go? No one really knows. There are strong calls for him
to hand over to Gordon Brown, his most likely successor, sooner
rather than later. Blair insists he will see out his term of office
and is already trying to rush legislation through on controversial
issues ranging from immigration control to identity cards. Blair
is obviously a fighter, but he is also driven by concerns about
his own legacy. This is partly what drove him into his fated relationship
with George W Bush. I think he rather fancied the idea of waging
a Churchillian-style global war and writing his name indelibly into
the history books. His ambitions got the better of him.
For
Africa, however, there may be a silver lining in Blairs gradual
demise. If I am correct and Blair worries not only about his current
reputation but how history will write about him, he will have to
do something spectacular before he leaves office to set the record
straight. In that regard, he will have his eye keenly on his forthcoming
role as chair of the G8. In a perverse way, coupled with growing
pressure from campaigns such as Make Poverty History, perhaps he
will choose the current context to make a move on African debt relief.
Not only will this balance his blunders in Iraq and increase his
international standing, at least in his mind, he will also steal
the thunder from Brown, who has championed the Africa debt issue.
So, as Blair scrambles to save his tarnished image, now is the time
for antidebt campaigners to turn up the heat. Who knows, for some
of the wrong reasons (and hopefully some right ones too), maybe
Blair is ready to agree to sweeping debt relief following the G8
Summit in July. Like Blairs election, the quality of such
a victory may not be entirely satisfying for antidebt campaigners,
but this will be of little concern if its impact makes a real difference
in Africa.
Brandon
Hamber writes the column "Look South": an analysis
of trends in global political, social and cultural life and its
relevance to South Africa on Polity, see http://www.polity.co.za/pol/opinion/brandon/.
To get "Look South" by email each week click
here.
"Look South" published by

|